You can download the newscast here or listen in the embedded player.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
National headlines
- Provincial and federal governments have different climate change agendas
- Al Gore comes to Toronto, tells Canada Tar Sands are killing the planet
- Billions of dollars of Tar-Sands projects are gearing back up after the economic crash
- Bank of Montreal and Toronto Dominion Bank pitch in to start carbon offset fund
- Report: Canada’s north needs to be more prepared to deal with climate change
- Harsh words between Quebec’s health experts and the asbestos industry
- Asian Carp may have crossed into the great lakes
- A new study from Pollution Probe and CAA highlight sources of green motivation< /a>
International headlines
- China unveils focus on intensity cuts
- Climate scientist, besieged over hacked emails, dismisses conspiracy claims
- Little evidence that boosting crop yields conserves land
- China and US elaborate on Copenhagen positions
NATIONAL HEADLINES
Provincial and federal governments have different climate change agendas
TYLER IRVING: On Wednesday, environment ministers from all of Canada’s provinces had dinner with their federal counterpart, Jim Prentice. This was the final meeting of Canada’s environment ministers before the start of the UN conference on climate change begins in Copenhagen on December 7th.
Ontario’s Environment Minister, John Gerretsen, called the meeting “productive” but also said that some provinces, especially Ontario and Quebec would like to see more ambitious action at the federal level. On Monday, Quebec’s Premier Jean Charest announced his province’s target to reduce carbon emissions to 20% below 1990 levels by 2020. This makes it the most ambitious target in North America. Ontario’s target is 15% over the same period, and the two provinces are members of the Western Climate Initiative, a group provinces and American states aiming to implement a cap-and-trade program by 2012.
For his part, Jim Prentice says that Canada will stick with the current plan, which is to match whatever commitment the United States is willing to make. The current federal target is often stated as 20% by 2020, but uses a baseline of 2006 rather than 1990. As for the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, yesterday he announced that despite earlier indications to the contrary, he will be present at the UN conference in Copenhagen. This follows announcements this week from both President Barack Obama and high-ranking Chinese officials that they too will be attending the conference.nbsp;[ index ]
Al Gore comes to Toronto, tells Canada Tar Sands are killing the planet
DARYN CAIISTER: Former US Vice-President Al Gore was in Toronto this week for a speaking event. At the event he continued his attack against the Alberta tar-sands projects. He made many statements that were meant to target the federal government, primarily the charge that the Alberta projects jeopardize the survival of the human species. His speaking engagement was called Thinking Green: Economic Strategy for the 21 Century. Tickets were as high as $500 per person, but the proceeds from the event were given to the David Suzuki Foundation. Mr. Gore also emphasised for the crowd that not only were many human lives at stake, but a lot of money and the future of human civilization. Also highlighted in his talk was reference to the Canadian government’s position of waiting for everyone else to decide before committing, and the compounding effects of the stalled climate change bill in the US senate. With hopes for legally binding CO2 reductions falling ahead of next month’s international climate talks in Copenhagen Mr. Gore expressed his disappointment at the pace of global leader’s negotiations. Many of the international agreements that have been under construction over the last year in preparation for the Copenhagen talks fall well short of science based targets and insight into the level of restrictions necessary to prevent runaway climate change, he said. One glimmer of hope is the US house bill this summer which committed to curb carbon emissions that passed by a narrow margin. In response to the few climate change deniers both in Canada and the United States, Mr. Gore said “Because this crisis is so unprecedented, it trigger the natural tendency we all have to confuse the unprecedented with the improbable.” Estimates vary, but Canada’s tar-sands are estimated by some reports to be as much as 15% of the world’s remaining recoverable oil, second only to Saudi Arabia. [ index ]
Billions of dollars of Tar-Sands projects are gearing back up after the economic crash
DARYN CAISTER: A new report by the Canadian Energy Research Institute noted that as much as $100 billion worth or cancelled or postponed tar-sands projects have been or are in the process of starting back up. The re-opening of construction and planning for these projects are starting back up in large part due to re-rising oil prices and because of good signs from many parts of a recovering world economy. The group also predicts that many more may become re-activated over the next 5-8 months. The report predicts that over the next 35 years Alberta tar-sands production will increase from 1.4 million barrels of crude and bitumen a day this year, 1.7 million by 2015 and 5.3 million barrels a day increased production by 2041. Some of these predictions have actually fallen from last year, for instance the previous report predicted 5 million barrels a day increase by as soon as 2015. CERI also predicts that the price of fuel oil will increase beyond $100 a barrel by 2013, and could surpass $200 a barrel by 2043 due mainly to steady growth from developing and industrializing nations such as India and China. For many of these re-opened projects, the investors are expecting a $100 barrel price to make in projects viable. While CERI, did not factor in or speculate on the effect of climate change policy limitations or cap and trade or cap systems being discussed an Copenhagen next year, however they are predicting that tar-sands project emissions would increase more than four times, to 137 million tonnes per year of carbon by 2043. [ index ]
Bank of Montreal and Toronto Dominion Bank pitch in to start carbon offset fund
TYLER IRVING: Canadian companies looking reduce their environmental impact got a new tool this week in the form of an investment fund that will generate emissions credits, rather than financial profit.
The Greening Canada Fund was announced Monday by Green Power Action Inc., a Toronto-based company that specializes in the management of carbon offset credits. Companies who invest in the fund will see their money go to support projects in the public, private, and non-profit sector that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This could include everything from installing new windows in a school or hospital to complete retrofits of commercial buildings or even the purchase of low-carbon vehicles. In return, the investors will receive carbon credits that they can use to lower their overall environmental footprint.
Although federal regulations on carbon emissions are still far from being in place, the program is currently attracting interest from companies who want to voluntarily reduce their carbon output. Initial investors include both the Bank of Montreal and the Toronto Dominion Bank, who together have pledged $13 million to the project. That amount is money is expected to generate carbon offsets equivalent to taking 190,000 cars off the road for a year. Green Power Action’s CEO, Gerry Rocchi, says he has an initial investment target of $50 million. The fund expects to start buying emission credits within the next month. [ index ]
Report: Canada’s north needs to be more prepared to deal with climate change
TYLER IRVING: A report released this week by the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE) states that Canada’s north is unprepared to deal with the effects of climate change.
The NRTEE is a government-appointed advisory group that includes members from the scientific, environmental, and business communities. In its report, NRTEE states that the north is on the front lines of climate change. For example, many communities are dependent throughout the winter months on ice roads that could fail to form in the coming years. As well, melting permafrost can wreak havoc with building foundations, as well as energy and communications infrastructure.
The report recommends changes to building codes and standards to take changing conditions in the north into account. It also recommends that the insurance system be reformed to deal with increased risks posed by climate change, and that disaster and emergency preparedness plans be reviewed. NRTEE CEO David McLaughlin says that the new report offers “practical advice to make infrastructure more resilient and less vulnerable to climate change.” [ index ]
Harsh words between Quebec’s health experts and the asbestos industry
DARYN CAISTER: Bernard Coulombe, President of the Jeffrey asbestos mine in Quebec called the provincial governments National Public Health Institute a “little gang of Talibans” this week. The puzzling comment, along with the dispute was replying to was sparked after the Jeffrey mine had hoped to sign a deal to open up new mines next year. The new pit would have been underground, and the current Jeffrey mine in and open pit mine; however it has run out of asbestos and is no longer operating. The Quebec public health agents stepped into the proceedings and opposed its own provincial government’s policies in allowing the mining and use of the material. The company claims that chrysotile asbestos, the form it mines and the only kind commercially traded in the world left today, is safe and claims it hasn’t harmed any workers since 1970. Public health officials however argue that it has records of increasing numbers of people, particularly constructions workers in Quebec, and dismisses the credibility of the mines reports out of hand. The inflammatory comment by Mr. Coulombe seems to be intended to describe him feelings that his company is being terrorized by having the provincial health officials scare the public. Media in Quebec has pointed out that the asbestos industry there has not attacked the Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Cancer Society, the World Health Organization or the Canadian Labour Congress who have all been outspoken proponents that chrysotile asbestos must be banned. The reason according to them is that it is because thy industry would rather go after public servants instead who have limited resources or individual influence to combat the attacks. The new mine, is about 90% complete at this time and would tap into a large new deposit of asbestos that would provide the company with enough to carry out its operations for a further 50 years if it is allowed to complete the project. [ index ]
Asian Carp may have crossed into the great lakes
TYLER IRVING: The Asian carp may have taken another crucial step in its slow invasion of North America’s waterways. Large in both size and infamy, the Asian carp were imported by catfish farmers in the southern U.S. to control algae in their ponds. Flooding of the Mississippi in the early 1990s caused some of the carp to escape into the river, and since then they have been slowly working their way north.
In 2002, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers installed an electronic barrier across the mouth of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, which is the waterway that connects the Mississippi watershed with the Great Lakes. A more permanent barrier was constructed in 2004, at a cost of $9 million. However, this week, the Army Corps of Engineers announced that Asian carp DNA has been found in the water just beyond the barrier, although no live fish have yet been spotted. Environmental groups such as Great Lakes United are demanding that locks on the canal be closed until it is demonstrated that the fish has not overcome the barriers.
Asian carp consist of four species, the grass, black, silver, and bighead carps. The fish can grow up to a metre long and consume up to 40% of their weight in plankton in a day, outcompeting many native species for food. Moreover, silver carp are known to leap out of the water when startled by the sound of outboard motors. In the past decade, numerous boaters and waterskiiers have been seriously injured when struck by jumping fish. If the species does reach the great lakes, conservation groups are predicting dire consequences for fisheries, tourism, and ecological stability. [ index ]
A new study from Pollution Probe and CAA highlight sources of green motivation
DARYN CAISTER: A new study by the Canadian Automotive Association and Pollution Probe describes what drives green car shoppers in Canada. According to the study, fuel efficiency, particularly the dollar value saved at the pump was by far the most important factor in buying a new vehicle. The study is not the first, but continues to confirm previous studies that environmental consciousness is not an important factor when buying a car in Canada, but that this does not by any mean that there isn’t a market for newer cleaner cars. Direct vehicle emissions in Canada are estimated to be about 12% of the Canadian totals of CO2 emitted per year. Interestingly, the study showed that fuel efficiency overall for the 800 surveyed drivers who had either just bought or are about to buy a car was by far the biggest factor for the purchase of greener cars, but that fuel efficiency overall is not a significant factor still for most drivers. The study also found that drivers believe that placing restrictions on manufacturers is the best way to lower vehicle emissions in Canada. Drivers also felt that purchaser incentives, tax rebates and public education were the most effective strategies in lowering vehicle emissions based on consumer preferences. [ index ]
INTERNATIONAL HEADLINES
China unveils focus on intensity cuts
SHAK HAQ: China has announced a new policy it says will maintain economic growth and convince the international community it is meeting its environmental responsibilities. The ambitious policy statement calls for a 45 per cent cut in carbon intensity by the year 2020, a target that received a positive reaction on Friday. Carbon intensity does not measure the actual amount of greenhouse gas emissions; it shows the amount emitted relative to its economic output, such as manufacturing and services. In a statement on Thursday, China’s state council said the drive to improve efficiency was a “voluntary action” which would make “a major contribution to the global effort in tackling climate change”. The announcement marks the first time China has set specific targets for cutting carbon emissions, seen as a major cause of global warming. Environmental groups have long complained that China is one of the world’s least efficient users of natural resources. The announcement came shortly after China’s foreign ministry said that Wen Jiabao, the Chinese premier, would travel to Copenhagen next month to attend the UN-backed global summit on climate change. A spokeswoman said Wen’s attendance would be a demonstration of China’s willingness to work with the international community to curb emissions and tackle climate change. China has said it will seek binding pollution cut targets for developed countries at the Copenhagen meeting, but will reject similar requirements for itself. Beijing has said repeatedly that it is unfair that all countries should be required to play a role combating global warming since most of the environmental damage was caused by developed nations. [ index ]
Climate scientist, besieged over hacked emails, dismisses conspiracy claims
SHAK HAQ: Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia denies emails provide evidence of collusion by climatologists to fix data. Professor Phil Jones Director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in Norwich says charges of conspiracy over climate change are ‘rubbish’. The climatologist at the centre of the leaked emails row said today that he “absolutely” stands by his research and that any suggestion that the emails provide evidence of a conspiracy to manipulate or hide data that do not support the theory of man-made climate change was “complete rubbish”. In his first full interview since last week’s theft, which saw hundreds of emails and documents exchanged between some of the leading climatologists over the past 13 years stolen from the university’s servers, Jones defended himself against accusations by climate skeptics that the emails provide evidence of collusion by climatologists to fix data. “That the world is warming is based on a range of sources: not only temperature records but other indicators such as sea level rise, glacier retreat and less Arctic sea ice,” he said. “Our global temperature series tallies with those of other, completely independent, groups of scientists working for Nasa and the National Climate Data Centre in the United States, among others. Even if you were to ignore our findings, theirs show the same results. The facts speak for themselves; there is no need for anyone to manipulate them.” Jones accepted, though, that the contents of some of the emails were cause for embarrassment: “Some of the emails probably had poorly chosen words and were sent in the heat of the moment, when I was frustrated. I do regret sending some of them. We’ve not deleted any emails or data here at CRU. I would never manipulate the data one bit – I would categorically deny that.” He confirmed that all of the leaked emails that had provoked heated debate – including the now infamous email from 1999 in which he discussed a “trick” to “hide the decline” in global temperatures – appeared to be genuine. [ index ]
China and US elaborate on Copenhagen position
SHAK HAQ: President Barack Obama is seeking to regain momentum for the Copenhagen climate summit, aiming for a “comprehensive agreement” that would spark immediate action even if it falls short of a legally binding treaty. The effort came as the Canadian government said failure to conclude a final deal in Copenhagen would further delay the release of Ottawa’s long-awaited climate regulations. After Mr. Obama and other Asia-Pacific leaders sounded a more cautionary tone on the weekend, the U.S. President emerged from a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao Tuesday saying the two sides had agreed to pursue a successful conclusion at Copenhagen next month. At an Asia-Pacific summit in Singapore on the weekend, the leaders acknowledged that time has run out for the conclusion of a final treaty that would include individual-country targets, as well as agreement on how developed countries would help finance mitigation and adaptation efforts by developing nations. Environmentalists were dismayed that global leaders appeared to be undermining the Copenhagen negotiations and feared they were setting the stage for endless negotiations and for delays by countries in moving forward with their domestic policies. The Canadian government is now indicating its will not release its regulations until late next year, after the conclusion of international talks and U.S. efforts to pass its own legislation. In a conference call from Copenhagen, Environment Minister Jim Prentice said Ottawa does not want to be out of step with an eventual international treaty, or with the American approach. It could take nearly all of 2010 to translate any political agreement achieved in Copenhagen into a full and binding treaty, said the minister, who is participating in a final round of negotiations before the summit begins on Dec. 7. “This kind of comprehensive agreement would be an important step forward in the effort to rally the world around a solution to our climate challenge.” He said the United States and China agreed that each would make significant efforts to reduce greenhouse gas and would “stand behind” commitments to do so made in Copenhagen. Mr. Hu emphasized the need for emerging countries such as China to bear a different level of responsibility for reducing emissions, as compared to more developed nations. But he, too, committed to work for a broad agreement at the summit in the Danish capital. The Obama administration, however, is reluctant to commit to specific targets for emission reductions until the Senate passes a cap-and-trade bill similar to the one approved by the House of Representatives that would reduce emissions by 17 per cent from 2005 levels by 2020. He has made it clear he does not want to sign anything in Copenhagen that could be used as political fodder for opponents of the bill in the Senate, which is not expected to vote on the legislation until the new year. For its part, China is expected to table targets for reducing the rate of growth in greenhouse-gas emissions as its economy expands, but has not agreed to including those targets in a binding, international accord. Given that Canada never came close to meeting its emission-reductions commitments under the Kyoto Protocol, Ottawa faces a credibility problem unless it produces a plan to meet its targets, said Jake Schmidt, international climate director for the Natural Resources Defense Council in Washington. [ index ]
Little evidence that boosting crop yields conserves land
SHAK HAQ: Growing crops in less space is good, but it may not be good enough without some help, say researchers who reviewed 35 years of data on cropland use by nation. Conservationists predict that revving up yields not only feeds an exploding population but also encourages farmers to let some of their land go wild again. Between 1970 and 2005, rising crop yields accompanied a drop in land used for agriculture nationwide in only 34 of 161 countries, says rural sociologist Tom Rudel of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J. The majority of those successful cases had extra factors, Rudel says; land sparing often came with increased grain imports or with government policies encouraging farmers to set aside some of their fields. Rudel and a team of agriculture specialists report their findings online November 23 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. You need a policy that assures the benefits, Rudel says. Otherwise, farmers may just increase total production while keeping the same amount of land in cultivation. “Intensification continues to be promoted to help developing countries,” says geographer Alan Grainger of the University of Leeds in England. “Development aid agencies invest huge sums of money in trying to make it a reality.” In theory, increasing yields boost supplies and prices sag. Farmers then take the less-productive land out of cultivation. To test this idea in a broad sweep, Rudel and his colleagues turned to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations on crop yields and land area in cultivation for 10 crops. These diverse foodstuffs account for 57 percent of the Earth’s cultivated land and include corn, wheat, rice, soybeans, potatoes, bananas, sugarcane, coffee, cocoa and cotton. During those years, world population grew by 74.3 percent, but cultivated land for those crops increased by only 25.7 percent, the researchers note. In a sense, that increased farming intensity saved land that might otherwise have been converted to agriculture, comments Paul Waggoner, of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station in New Haven, who has written about land-use issues. Yet the land area devoted to agriculture still increased overall, Rudel notes. He and his colleagues did find some countries, however, in which the amount of land in cultivation decreased as a whole when yields rose. That was the case in Austria, for example, during a period when farmers were encouraged to set aside some of their fields for conservation. These lands can benefit the ecosystem by reducing erosion, providing wildlife habitat and sequestering carbon.nbsp;[ index ]
You can see the complete episode here: TGM #165 (November 27, 2009)



